Keywords
focus groups
diabetic retinopathy
participants
qualitative research
Abstract
Background: The incidence of diabetes mellitus continues to rise steadily over the years, contributing to a significant increase in the risk of developing eye-related complications. The escalating burden of vision-related complications urge the early prevention measures for type 2 diabetes mellitus population.
Purpose: Explore factors influencing the understanding of diabetic retinopathy among participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who attended a diabetic clinic in a tertiary teaching hospital in Malaysia.
Methods: This study employed a descriptive qualitative design using purposive sampling. From March to April 2021, three focus group discussions ranging in length from 30 minutes to an hour were performed utilising a semi-structured interview guide conducted with nine participants (five women and four men) aged 35 to 65 visited the diabetic clinic. Participants included in the study were who had type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed after six months or more. Data retrieved was thematically analysed using ATLAS/ti software, following the qualitative data analysis stages.
Results:. Two themes emerged: challenges in practicing self-care and facilitating factors for health education. Subthemes within the challenges of practicing self-care included lack of knowledge about eye anatomy, changes in vision quality, concerns about medication intake, issues with glucose monitoring, challenges in nutritional management, and alternative practices. Subtheme for facilitating factors for health education included team work for giving health education, elements in diabetic retinopathy health education and teaching aid.
Conclusions: Despite the availability of health education materials in the clinical context, participants identified a need for greater depth in diabetic retinopathy implications. Future studies and efforts include developing educational programs.
References
American Association of Diabetes Educators. (2020). An effective model of diabetes care and education: Revising the AADE7 self-care behaviors®. The Diabetes Educator, 46(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721719894903
Braun V., Clarke V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806
Burton, M. J., Ramke, J., Marques, A. P., Bourne, R. R. A., Congdon, N., Jones, I., Ah Tong, B. A. M., Arunga, S., Bachani, D., Bascaran, C., Bastawrous, A., Blanchet, K., Braithwaite, T., Buchan, J. C., Cairns, J., Cama, A., Chagunda, M., Chuluunkhuu, C., Cooper, A., Crofts-Lawrence, J., & Faal, H. B. (2021). The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: Vision beyond 2020. The Lancet Global Health, 9(4), e489–e551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30488-5
Chew, F. L. M., Salowi, M. A., Mustari, Z., Husni, M. A., Hussein, E., Adnan, T. H., Ngah, N. F., Limburg, H., & Goh, P. P. (2018). Estimates of visual impairment and its causes from the National Eye Survey in Malaysia (NESII). PloS one, 13(6), e0198799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198799
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). London: SAGE.
Fitzpatrick P. J. (2023). Improving health literacy using the power of digital communications to achieve better health outcomes for patients and practitioners. Frontiers in digital health, 5, 1264780. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1264780
Goh, P. P., Omar, M. A., & Yusoff, A. F. (2010). Diabetic eye screening in Malaysia: Findings from the National Health and Morbidity Survey 2006. Singapore Medical Journal, 51(8), 631–634.
Huang, O. S., Tay, W. T., Ong, P. G., Sabanayagam, C., Cheng, C. Y., Tan, G. S., Cheung, G. C., Lamoureux, E. L., & Wong, T. Y. (2015). Prevalence and determinants of undiagnosed diabetic retinopathy and vision-threatening retinopathy in a multiethnic Asian cohort: The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases (SEED) study. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 99(12), 1614–1621. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306492
International Diabetes Federation. (2021). IDF Diabetes Atlas (10th ed.) [Internet]. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation. Updated 2022. Retrieved July 23, 2024, from https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/
Khalaf, F. R., Fahmy, H. M., Ibrahim, A. K., Mohamed, G. A., El Sayed Ez Eldeen, M., Elkady, A., & Hetta, H. F. (2019). Does a diabetic retinopathy educational program raise awareness among elderly diabetic participants? Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, 12, 1867–1875. https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S208072
Li, Z., Chen, Q., Yan, J., et al. (2020). Effectiveness of motivational interviewing on improving care for participants with type 2 diabetes in China: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research, 20, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4776-8
Ligita, T., Wicking, K., Francis, K., Harvey, N., & Nurjannah, I. (2019). How people living with diabetes in Indonesia learn about their disease: A grounded theory study. PLoS ONE, 14(2), e0212019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212019
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2013). The constructivist credo. Left Coast Press.
Meng, Q., Cui, Y., Zhang, M., Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Kuang, J., Liu, Q., Zheng, Y., Luo, Z., Liu, H., Zhu, G., Cai, J., Zhang, G., Wen, X., & Guo, H. (2016). Design and baseline characteristics of a population-based study of eye disease in southern Chinese people: The Dongguan Eye Study. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 44(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12670
Moinul, P., Barbosa, J., Qian, J., et al. (2020). Does patient education improve compliance to routine diabetic retinopathy screening? Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 26(3), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X18804749
Moura, N. D. S., Lopes, B. B., Teixeira, J. J. D., Oriá, M. O. B., Vieira, N. F. C., & Guedes, M. V. C. (2019). Literacy in health and self-care in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 72(3), 700–706. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0291
Murray, E., Daff, K., Lavida, A., et al. (2019). Evaluation of the digital diabetes prevention programme pilot: Uncontrolled mixed-methods study protocol. BMJ Open, 9, e025903. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025903
Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2014). Focus groups: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Wong, T. Y., Tham, Y. C., Sabanayagam, C., & Cheng, C. Y. (2019). Patterns and risk factor profiles of visual loss in a multiethnic Asian population: The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 206, 48–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.05.006
World Health Organization. (2023, October 10). Blindness and vision impairment. WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment
Zarkogianni, K., Litsa, E., Mitsis, K., Wu, P. Y., Kaddi, C. D., Cheng, C. W., Wang, M. D., & Nikita, K. S. (2015). A review of emerging technologies for the management of diabetes mellitus. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 62(12), 2735–2749. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2015.2470521
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Rif’atunnailah Mat Isa, Chong Mei-Chan, Lee Wan Ling, Tajunisah Iqbal, Mohd Iman Saiful Suhardi, Thandar Soe@Sumaiyah Jamaludin