Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Original

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Keperawatan Padjadjaran

Milk-sharing experiences: Perspective among Malaysian donors and rexipient mothers

DOI
https://doi.org/10.24198/jkp.v13i1.2571
Submitted
July 10, 2024
Published
2025-04-25

Abstract

Background: Shared breastmilk has been a longstanding tradition in many cultures throughout history through wet nursing, cross nursing, and the donation of expressed breastmilk to a milk bank. However, social media has introduced some new dynamics to this practice, making it more visible and accessible; and it is known as milk-sharing. Research on milk sharing is still in its infancy and focused on western perspectives. Therefore, the sociocultural dimensions of milk sharing have not been adequately explored across different settings and cultures.   Purpose: This qualitative study aims at understanding the milk-sharing experiences among donor and recipient mothers in Malaysia.   Methods: We conducted a social media analysis on milk-sharing postings from four Facebook Groups Pages. This was followed by a detailed exploration of individual experiences throughout the milk-sharing journey using a semi-structured, online interview with thirty mothers. Thematic analysis was applied in the data analysis process using ATLAS.ti 9 software.   Results: A total of 252 postings were retrieved from four Facebook Groups Pages. Of these, 151 postings referred to donating milk, 70 referred to requesting milk, and 31 focused on issues related to milk-sharing. Thirty mothers with various milk-sharing experiences were involved in this study. Fifteen donors, six recipients, and nine fell into both categories. The mothers in the study had an average age of 32.9 years and the majority were Malay. In terms of their relationship with the infants, 93.3% were biological mothers with the majority having two to five children. Thematic analysis identified five themes: 1) point of reference, 2) communication platform, 3) altruism for mutual benefit, 4) faith and 5) challenges and problem-solving methods.   Conclusions: Milk sharing is a personal and sociocultural-bounded practice where mothers negotiate their understanding of the need to breastfeed and the use of donated breastmilk. Despite its specific focus on the Malaysian context, this research offers a complementary understanding of milk sharing within a non-Western framework and transferable to similar sociocultural backgrounds. The findings are important for intercultural nursing and midwifery practice, where nurses can incorporate sociocultural perspectives into breastmilk donation initiatives to increase public acceptance.

Article Matrics
Abstract views : 228 times PDF Downloads: 8

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Banu B. & Khanom, K. (2012). Effects of education level of father and mother on perceptions of breastfeeding. Journal of Enam Medical College 2(2): 67–73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3329/jemc.v2i2.12840
  2. Bawany, M., Milhan, A. & Padela, A. (2016). The unbreakable relationship. Are Muslims aware of the Islamic bioethical perspectives on human breast milk banking. Islamic Horizons 48 (51): 48-51.
  3. Birt, L., Scott. S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C. & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research 26(13):1802–1811. doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
  4. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. Bressler, T., Dambra-Candelaria, L. M. & Spatz, D.L. (2020). Informal milk sharing for the hospitalized at-risk infant in the ultra-orthodox-haredi Jewish community in the United States. Breastfeeding Medicine 15(5): 335–340. doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2019.0216
  6. Broder, A.Z., Glassman, S.C. & Manasse, M.S. & Zweig, G. (1997). Syntactic clustering of the Web. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 29(8–13): 1157–1166. doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7552(97)00031-7
  7. Cheney, A.M., Nieri, T., Davis, E., Prologo, J. Valencia, E., Anderson, A.T., Widaman, K., Reaves, C. & Sullivan, G. (2019). The sociocultural factors underlying Latina mothers’ infant feeding practices. Global Qualitative Nursing Research 6: 1-11. doi.org/10.1177/2333393618825253
  8. Creswell, J.W. & Poth, C.N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design (International Student Edition): Choosing Among Five Approaches. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  9. Daud, N., Nordin, N., Shukry, A.S.M., Ali, R.M. & Mohamed, Z. (2014). A study of the understanding amongst academia towards the Islamic concept of breastfeeding. Asian Social Science 10(19): 230-239. doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n19p230
  10. Department of Statistics Malaysia (2022) Current population estimates, Malaysia. Available at: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1_/ (accessed 1 October 2022)
  11. Dong, Y., Chi, X., Huang, H., Sun, L., Zhang, M., Xie, W. & Chen, W. (2020). Antibodies in the breast milk of a maternal woman with COVID-19. Emerging Microbes & Infections 9(1): 146701469. doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1780952
  12. Gribble, K.D. (2013). Peer-to-peer milk donors’ and recipients’ experiences and perceptions of donor milk banks. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 42(4): 451–461. doi.org/10.1111/1552-6909.12220
  13. He, W., Zha, S. & Li, L. (2013). Social media competitive analysis and text mining: A case study in the pizza industry. International Journal of Information Management 33(3): 464–472. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.01.001
  14. Jamil, N.A., Lee, K., Cheong, A.T. & Muda, S.M. (2021). An emerging trend in infant feeding practice: a scoping review on breastmilk sharing. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery 12(4): 555-568. doi.org/10.15452/cejnm.2020.11.0036
  15. Jamil, N.A., Muda, S.M. & Ismail, H. (2016). Breastfeeding in Islamic perspective: Thematic analysis. In: 2nd Congress World Congress on Integration and Islamicisation of Knowledge: Focus on Medical & Health Care Sciences. Pahang, Malaysia, 20-23 October 2016, pp. Malaysia: IIUM Repository.
  16. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation 1986(30): 73–84. doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
  17. McCloskey, R.J., & Karandikar, S. (2018). A liberation health approach to examining challenges and facilitators of peer-to-peer human milk sharing. Journal of Human Lactation 34(3): 438–447. doi.org/10.1177/0890334418771301
  18. Mohamad, E., Ahmad, A.L., Rahim, S.A. & Pawanteh, L. (2013). Understanding religion and social expectations in contemporary Muslim society when promoting breastfeeding. Asian Social Science 9(10): 264-273. doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n10p264
  19. Mufti of Federal Territory Office. (2016). Bayan Linnas Siri Ke-70: Isu Berkenaan Ibu Susuan & Pelbagai Hukum. Available at: https://muftiwp.gov.my/en/artikel/bayan-linnas/1138-bayan-linnas-siri-70-isu-berkenaan-ibu-susuan-pelbagai-hukum-kad-atau-sijil-susuan (accessed 30 October 2018)
  20. Novick, G. (2008). Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Research in Nursing & Health 31(4): 391–398. doi.org/10.1002/nur.20259
  21. O’Sullivan, E.J., Geraghty, S.R. & Rasmussen, K.M. (2016). Informal human milk sharing: A qualitative exploration of the attitudes and experiences of mothers. Journal of Human Lactation, 32(3), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334416651067
  22. Obladen, M. (2012). Guttus, tiralatte and téterelle: a history of breast pumps. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 40(6): 669-675. doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2012-0120.
  23. Onat, G. & Karakoç, H. (2019). Informal breastmilk sharing in a Muslim country: the frequency, practice, risk perception, and risk reduction strategies used by mothers. Breastfeeding Medicine 14(8):597–602. doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2019.0027
  24. Pak-Gorstein, S., Haq, A. & Graham, E.A. (2009). Cultural influences on infant feeding practices. Pediatrics in Review 30(3): e11–e21. doi.org/10.1542/pir.30-3-e11
  25. Palmquist, A.E., Perrin, M.T., Cassar-Uhl, D., Gribble, K.D., Bond, A.B. & Cassidy, T. (2019). Current trends in research on human milk exchange for infant feeding. Journal of Human Lactation 35(3): 453-477. doi:10.1177/0890334419850820
  26. Smart Insights (2018) Global social media statistics research summary 2018. Available at: https://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/ (accessed 29 January 2019)
  27. Stake, R.E. (2010). Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. New York: The Guilford Press.
  28. Statista. (2022). Malaysia: Number of Facebook users 2017-2025. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/490484/number-of-malaysia-facebook-users/ (accessed 8 December 2022).
  29. Stevens, J. & Keim, S.A. (2015). How research on charitable giving can inform strategies to promote human milk donations to milk banks. Journal of Human Lactation 31(3): 344–347. doi.org/10.1177/0890334415571458
  30. Thorley, V. (2011) Mothers’ experiences of sharing breastfeeding or breastmilk, part 2: the early 21st century. Nursing Reports 2(1): e2. doi.org/10.4081/nursrep.2012.e2
  31. Vogel, L. (2011). Milk sharing: boon or biohazard? Canadian Medical Association Journal 183(3): E155–E156. doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3767
  32. Wagg., A.J., Hassett, A. & Callanan, M.M. (2022). “It’s more than milk, it’s mental health”: A case of online human milk sharing. International Breastfeeding Journal 17(5): 1-12. doi.org/10.1186/s13006-021-00445-6
  33. World Health Organisation (2018) WHO and UNICEF issue new guidance to promote breastfeeding in health facilities globally. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/11-04-2018-who-and-unicef-issue-new-guidance-to-promote-breastfeeding-in-health-facilities-globally (accessed 11 November 2019).
  34. Zhu, H., Wang, L., Fang, C., Peng, S., Zhang, L., Chang, G., Xia, S. & Zhou, W. (2020). Clinical analysis of 10 neonates born to mothers with 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Translational Pediatrics 9(1): 51–60. doi.org/10.21037/tp.2020.02.06