Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Padjadjaran of Nursing Journal

Review

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Keperawatan Padjadjaran

Measurement tools used to assess interprofessional education and collaborative practice in health professional students: A COSMIN systematic and psychometric review

DOI
https://doi.org/10.24198/jkp.v12i2.2570
Submitted
July 8, 2024
Published
2024-08-28

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional education and collaborative practice (IPE/IPC) are essential for preparing students to work together and respect the unique qualities and abilities of professionals. However, IPE/IPC and its related concepts are highly abstract phenomena and complicated to assess and measure. In consequence, a critical appraisal is needed to evaluate the quality of the instruments. Purpose: This study aimed to critically appraise, compare and summarize the quality of measurement properties of all self-report collaboration questionnaires for health professional students and to provide evidence concerning the psychometric properties of the measurement. Methods: A psychometric review was employed, and the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) approach was applied to assess the methodological quality of the nature of the measurements. Data search using keywords: health professional students, interprofessional, collaboration, teamwork, collaborative, through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EBSCO-hosted Education Resource Information Centre databases. Results: Seven instruments from 10 reviewed studies were identified. Among them, four instruments targeted attitudes toward collaboration. One instrument focused on students' collaborative learning readiness and had been tested in Hong Kong using English, in Iran using Persian, and in Indonesia using Bahasa Indonesia. One instrument measured perception about IPE, and two studies measured IPE/IPC competencies related to patient-centered, team-based, and collaborative care. The methodological quality assessment indicated that several instruments were less rigorously developed and validated than COSMIN and Quality Criteria of Measurement Properties recommend. Conclusions: The findings of this psychometric review are that the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale is an instrument with adequate content validation and very good structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, reliability, measurement error, and criterion validity. It is recommended that the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale be used to measure the interprofessional attitudes of health professional students. 

Article Matrics
Abstract views : 1164 times PDF Downloads: 128

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Archibald, D., Trumpower, D., & MacDonald, C. J. (2014). Validation of the interprofessional collaborative competency attainment survey (ICCAS). Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(6), 553–558. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.917407
  2. Ataollahi, M., Amini, M., Delavari, S., Bazrafkan, L., & Jafari, P. (2019). Reliability and validity of the Persian version of readiness for inter-professional learning scale. International Journal of Medical Education, 10, 203–207. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5da4.37c2
  3. Curran, V. R., Sharpe, D., & Forristall, J. (2007). Attitudes of health sciences faculty members towards interprofessional teamwork and education. Medical Education, 41(9), 892–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02823.x
  4. Dominguez, D. G., Fike, D. S., Maclaughlin, E. J., & Zorek, J. A. (2015). A comparison of the validity of two instruments assessing health professional student perceptions of interprofessional education and practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(2), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.947360
  5. Fike, D. S., Zorek, J. A., MacLaughlin, A. A., Samiuddin, M., Young, R. B., & MacLaughlin, E. J. (2013). Development and validation of the student perceptions of physician-pharmacist interprofessional clinical education (SPICE) instrument. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(9), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe779190
  6. Ganotice, F. A., & Chan, L. K. (2018). Construct validation of the English version of Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS): Are Chinese undergraduate students ready for ‘shared learning’? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 32(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1359508
  7. Hayashi, T., Shinozaki, H., Makino, T., Ogawara, H., Asakawa, Y., Iwasaki, K., Matsuda, T., Abe, Y., Tozato, F., Koizumi, M., Yasukawa, T., Lee, B., Hayashi, K., & Watanabe, H. (2012). Changes in attitudes toward interprofessional health care teams and education in the first- and third-year undergraduate students. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(2), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2011.644355
  8. Heinemann, G. D., Schmitt, M. H., Farrell, M. P., & Brallier, S. A. (1999). Development of an attitudes toward health care teams scale. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 22(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/01632789922034202
  9. Hojat, M., & Herman, M. W. (1985). Developing an instrument to measure attitudes toward nurses: preliminary psychometric findings. Psychological Reports, 56(2), 571–579. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1985.56.2.571
  10. Hojat, M., Spandorfer, J., Isenberg, G. A., Vergare, M. J., Fassihi, R., & Gonnella, J. S. (2012). Psychometrics of the scale of attitudes toward physician-pharmacist collaboration: A study with medical students. Medical Teacher, 34(12), 833–837. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.714877
  11. Hojat, M., Ward, J., Spandorfer, J., Arenson, C., Van Winkle, L. J., & Williams, B. (2014). The Jefferson Scale of Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Collaboration (JeffSATIC): Development and multi-institution psychometric data. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(3), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.962129
  12. Kajander-Unkuri, S., Meretoja, R., Katajisto, J., Saarikoski, M., Salminen, L., Suhonen, R., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2014). Self-assessed level of competence of graduating nursing students and factors related to it. Nurse Education Today, 34(5), 795–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.08.009
  13. Kim, K., & Ko, J. (2014). Attitudes toward interprofessional health care teams scale: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(2), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2013.857645
  14. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ (Online), 339(7716), 332–336. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
  15. Mokkink, L. B., de Vet, H. C. W., Prinsen, C. A., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN Methodology for Conducting Systematic Reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, February, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_2972-2
  16. Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & De Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
  17. Norris, J., Carpenter, J. G., Eaton, J., Guo, J.-W., Lassche, M., Pett, M. A., & Blumenthal, D. K. (2015). The Development and Validation of the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale. Academic Medicine, 90(10), 1394–1400. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000764
  18. Oates, M., & Davidson, M. (2015). A critical appraisal of instruments to measure outcomes of interprofessional education. Medical Education, 49(4), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12681
  19. Schmitz, C. C., Radosevich, D. M., Jardine, P., MacDonald, C. J., Trumpower, D., & Archibald, D. (2017). The Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS): A replication validation study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2016.1233096
  20. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
  21. Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Ostelo, R. W. J. G., Bouter, L. M., & De Vet, H. C. W. (2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1
  22. Tibi, M. H. (2015). Improving Collaborative Skills by Computer Science Students through Structured Discussion Forums. Journal of Technologies in Education, 10(3–4), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.18848/2381-9243/cgp/v10i3-4/56460
  23. Tyastuti, D., Onishi, H., Ekayanti, F., & Kitamura, K. (2014). Psychometric item analysis and validation of the Indonesian version of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS). Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(5), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.907778
  24. World Health Organization [WHO]. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-education-collaborative-practice