Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Padjadjaran of Nursing Journal

Original

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018): Jurnal Keperawatan Padjadjaran

Development of Team Cohesiveness Measurement Instruments in Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in Health Care

DOI
https://doi.org/10.24198/jkp.v6i1.623
Submitted
December 6, 2017
Published
2018-04-30

Abstract

AbstractHealth care management has an obligation to always provide safe, sustainable, comprehensive, quality and satisfactory health care for both the service user and care provider. The management and culture are built through the Interprofessional Health Care Collaborative Practice Model (MPIPK), which are implemented through four model components, i.e. the clinical pathway of patient management, team management of patients, patient care integrated documentation, and interdisciplinary patient problem solving through interdisciplinary case conference forums. In order to realize interprofessional collaboration practices, a cohesive climate is required that supports group functions and performances, and an instrument is needed to measure the team cohesiveness of this model. This research was conducted to develop a team cohesiveness measurement instrument in the interprofessional collaboration of health care. The instrumentation research design was carried out through the following steps: 1) Preparations of the instrument design commenced from the synthesis theory related to collective culture and individual culture on four components of the model; 2) Validation of the contents of the instrument with related experts; 3) Construct validation with 237 healthcare practitioners in an accredited hospital setting. Expert judgment results on instrument relevance (CVI) ranged from 0.77 to 0.91, the essence of instrument contents (CVR) was in range (+) 0.27 - 0.63, CVI and CVR scores indicated the relevant and essential content of the instrument. Test results of all constructed items were valid (0.283 - 0.847) and reliable, α Cronbach on 4 components (0.792 - 0.963) so, it is feasible to be used to measure the team cohesiveness.

Article Matrics
Abstract views : 502 times PDF Downloads: 167

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bigley, M.B., 2006, Interdisciplinary Health Care Teams: Organizational Context, Team Performance, Team Development and Team Goals. [Dissertation].School of Public health and Health Services, The George Washington University. Available at http://proquest.umi.com
  2. Brannick, T., Coghlan, D., 2006, To know and to do: Academics’ and Practitioners†approach to Management research. Irish Journal of Management,26(2): 1-22
  3. Clark, P.G., Drinka, T.J.K., 2000, Health Care Teamwork : Interdisciplinary practice and Teaching. Auburn House, West Point
  4. Cohen, M.B., 2005, Why Culture Matters in Health Care, paper presented at Community Voices Summit: Health Care in a Multicultural Society. Available at http://www.communityvoices.org
  5. Huber, L., 2010, Interdisciplinary Teamwork Helps Quality Effort Reach New Height. AORN Journal. 92 (3): 345
  6. Kasperski M., 2000, Implementation strategies: ‘Collaboration in primary care family doctors and nurse practitioners deliveringshared care.’ Toronto, ON: Ontario College of Family Physicians. Available from: http://www.cfpc.ca/English/CFPC/CLFM/bibnursing
  7. Larsson H, Tegern M, Monnier A, Skoglund J, Helander C, Persson E, et al. (2015) Content Validity Index and Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of a New Muscle Strength/Endurance Test Battery for Swedish Soldiers. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0132185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.013218
  8. Lawshe, C.H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  9. Mitchell, P.H., Crittenden, R.A., 2000, Interdisciplinarry Collaboration: Old Ideas with New Urgency.Washington Public Health Organizations.
  10. Orchard, C.A., Curran,V., Kabene, S., 2005, Creating a Culture for Interdisciplinarry Collaborative Professional Practice. Med.Educ.Online; 10:11 Available at http://www.med-ed-online.org
  11. Petri, L., 2010, Concept Analysis of Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Nursing Forum. 45 (2): 73-83
  12. Polit, F., D., Beck, C.,T., 2006, Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 7th ed.
  13. Reeves, S.,Lewin, S.,Espin, S.,Zwarenstein, M.,2010, Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social Care.Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISBN: 978-1-405-18191-4
  14. Sullivan, E.J., 1999, Creating Nursing’s Futures: Issues, Opportunities and Challenges. Mosby, Inc., St Louis.
  15. Susilaningsih, F.S.,2011, Model Pelayanan Rawat Inap Terpadu (MPRIT) Sebagai Basis Integrasi Antar Profesi Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan Di RS Pendidikan Dr Hasan Sadikin. [Disertasi]. Universitas Gajah Mada
  16. Wang, E.,Chou, HW.,Jiang, J.,(2005), The Impacts of Charismatic Leadership Style on Team Cohessiveness and Overall Performance during ERP Implementation. International Journal of Project Management.23(3): 173-180
  17. World Health Organization [WHO], 2009, Human Factors in Patient Safety: Review of Topics And Tools. Retrieved from http://who.int/patientsafety/research/methods_measures/human_factors/en/
  18. WHO, 2010, Framework For Action on Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice. Retrieved from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2010/WHO_HRH_HPN_eng.pdf